This post is fifth in a series drawn from a History of I.S.9 (CMF) in the British National Archives. Research courtesy of Brian Sims.

See also “I.S.9 History—Organization,” “I.S.9 History—Tasks,”I.S.9 History—Methods,” and “I.S.9 History—Communications”

Below is a transcript of sections of the history detailing agent choice, training, and management:

Agents, Choice of

This paragraph must be sub-divided into (a) the choice of long term Agents, and (b) short term Agents, and again should be sub-divided into 2 periods, first that period of the early rush of activities when we really knew little or nothing of the “form” concerning Agents and a little later when it was quit obvious that our first ideas needed considerable change.

Therefore let us take (a) first.

The choice of agents during the period of our activities, when we were still in N. AFRICA and before the invasion of ITALY had taken place, was extremely limited. So difficult did it become after a few enquiries had been made that we were finally limited to the recruitment and use of Italian prisoners of war. The choice was further limited in view of the few recruits willing to undertake the risk of returning to ITALY and working for us. The absence of any large numbers of Italian P/W willing to return to ITALY can be well understood when it is stated that at that time there were extremely few (if any) Agents working in ITALY for clandestine organizations. The activities of the OVRA [Mussolini’s secret police] and other Fascist counter-espionage services made matters almost, if not quite impossible, for clandestine work.

Continue reading →

This post is fourth in a series drawn from a History of I.S.9 (CMF) in the British National Archives. Research courtesy of Brian Sims.

See also “I.S.9 History—Organization,” “I.S.9 History—Tasks,” and I.S.9 History—Methods.”

Below is the section on Communications from the history. I found the most surprising aspect of this chapter was the use of pigeons (“our feathered friends”) for communications.

Communications

This most essential part of any organization such as I.S.9 must be taken in two parts:-

(a) Inter communication between HQs [headquarters] and Sections.
(b) Clandestine communications by means of sets behind enemy lines.

To take (a) first.

The first 6-months or so of active rescue work in ITALY was made doubly difficult by reason of the lack of Communications between HQs and the Field Sections. It must be obvious to any reader that, at the best and under static conditions, Communications by means of Army Signals channels is uncertain and by no means rapid. This is due to no fault of the R.C.S. [Royal Corps of Signals], whose work during the Italian campaign has been magnificent, but due to circumstances generally beyond the control of any person.

It was unusual to find a Section very near to a higher Army Foundation where cypher personnel were available for “Top Secret” messages, or sufficiently near any formation happy to have an additional unit attached to it for Signals purposes.

Continue reading →

This post is third in a series drawn from a History of I.S.9 (CMF) in the British National Archives. Access to the document was courtesy of researcher Brian Sims.

See also “I.S.9 History—Organization” and “I.S.9 History—Tasks.”

Below is a transcript of a short chapter on methods from the history:

Methods

We could deal with this paragraph in the two words “All methods”.

That is just about the way of things, for we used land, sea and air for supply and evacuation. We used our own personnel, Partizans, Italian soldiers and sailors, and Allied Missions in E.O.T. I.S.9 (CMF) were not jealous and everybody and anybody who could help to aid or to evacuate evaders and escapers were used.

Under the headings or paragraphs that follow, more details of how we used these methods will, it is hoped, be gathered by the reader who cares to read this “History” to the end.

Help Given to I.S.9 Work by Others.

Friendly Natives.

It must be confessed at once that the organization of I.S.9 could not have functioned behind the enemy’s lines in ITALY or YUGOSLAVIA with any great measure of success had it not been for the tremendous help afforded to it’s personnel and to the E & Es by a friendly population.

It is true that throughout the whole campaign Fascists in ITALY and in certain areas in YUGOSLAVIA, the Ustachi, were at all times a danger likely to be encountered and often constituted a greater danger to clandestine work than did the Germans. In spite, however, of the activities of these parties the greater majority of natives, and in particular the small farmers, gave all possible help to clandestine operatives and to E & Es.

Continue reading →

This post is second in what will be a series drawn from a History of I.S.9 (CMF) in the British National Archives. My access to the document was courtesy of researcher Brian Sims.

See also “I.S.9 History—Organization.”

Below is a transcript of a short chapter on tasks from the history:

Tasks

The tasks of I.S.9 (CMF) were of course as indicated by its Charter.

(a) The supply Intelligence to the appropriate authorities by means of Interrogation of returning escapers and evaders (referred to hereinafter as E & Es).

(b) To instruct and brief all Imperial and American Air Force personnel and Ground Forces on conduct as a P/W [prisoner of war] and on escape and evasion.

(c) To supply Aids and Devices to help in evasion and capture.

(d) To contact, assist and if possible rescue, by any means except by direct force of arms, all Imperial and American evaders and P/W within the following countries:- ITALY, YUGOSLAVIA, ALBANIA, AUSTRIA.

(e) To recommend to the appropriate authorities those E & Es to be considered or Honours and Awards for conduct during capture, escape or during evasion and to forward to appropriate authorities details of those E & Es whose actions might be construed as being contrary to the high traditions of the three Services.

(f) To reward civilian helpers assisting E & Es in the countries mentioned above and to forward to appropriate authorities details in connection with atrocities committed against E & Es.

Continue reading →

Recently British researcher Brian Sims shared an interesting document with me that he had discovered in the British National Archives.

Written at the end of World War II, the document, a history of I.S.9 (Intelligence School 9) from November 1, 1943 to May 31, 1945, was written as an attachment to a memorandum to the Deputy Director of Military Intelligence (DDMI).

Fortunately for today’s readers, it was written in a style, “which might easily be read by non-regular soldiers.”

The 196-page report offers a detailed account of the structure, mission, and activities of I.S.9, which had as its chief task the support and rescue of escaped POWs and evaders (E&Es) stranded in enemy territory in Italy and elsewhere in Europe.

I.S.9 activities fell under M.I.9 (British Directorate of Military Intelligence Section 9), a department of the War Office during WW II.

This post will be the first of several on this site over the coming weeks that shed light on I.S.9, drawing from various sections of the report.

I am grateful to Brian for this material and for assistance in helping me sort through sundry military abbreviations and acronyms.

Below is a transcript of the opening section of the history, which explains the origin and organizational structure of I.S.9.

History of I.S.9 Central Mediterranean Force

ATTACHMENT “F” to DDMI (PW)s Memorandum

HISTORICAL RECORD OF I.S.9 (CMF)
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS ‘N’ SECTION ‘A’ FORCE)
FROM 1.11.43 TO 31.5.45 [November 1, 1943—May 31, 1945]

THE ORGANIZATION

To write the history of, or a guide to, M.I.9 activities in a Theatre of War and in particular the actual Theatre of War allocated to I.S.9 (CMF) calls for a writer of historic novels, a writer with a sense of the dramatic but a writer who would always maintain a sense of proportion.

So much has happened during the course of the exciting two years, which started for I.S.9 (CMF) with 2 officers being landed on the beach at SYRACUSE: 2 officers with their kit but with no transport and with no idea as to their purpose in life, apart from the most pointed directive that they were to learn how best rescue work might be accomplished with an Army in the Field.

These two officers learned, quite quickly, one vital lesson, namely, that no rescue work of any kind would be possible unless an I.S.9 team or Unit was self contained and mobile.

Continue reading →